Four Little Words

Has anyone wondered what happened to FISA reform that President Obama promised to do after he took office? Well if this is his idea of reform, he is no better than the gang that occupied the Executive for the last 8 years.

In today’s Washington Post, the White House proposal would ease FBI access to records of Internet activity by adding four little words, electronic communication transactional records, the government will have access to the addresses to which an Internet user sends e-mail; the times and dates e-mail was sent and received; and possibly a user’s browser history. The government lawyers are claiming that it would not grant access to content. If you believe that I have a bridge in Brooklyn I can sell you.

From emptywheel at FDL:

Make no mistake. This is one of the most important pieces of civil liberties news in a long time. The Obama Administration is asking Congress to sanction the collection of internet records without a warrant that has been going on-the kind of shit they used to do without a warrant, until people expressed their opposition.

But then Democrats took over and now they want legal sanction and now-Voila, a request that presumably provides cover.

As Glen Greenwald said, “One Point, contrary to blatant strawman incessantly raised by Obama loyalists that the criticisms are NOT grounded in the complaints that Obama has failed to act quickly enough to usher in progressive policies but instead are based on the horrendous policies which Obama himself has affirmatively and explicitly adopted as his own, many of which directly contradict what he vowed to do as President.”

Obama has gone further than Bush by ordering the assassination of an American citizen abroad without due process and now this. Kevin Drum at Mother Jones said it best last night

You know, if I’d wanted Dick Cheney as president I would have just voted for him.

9 comments

Skip to comment form

    • on 07/29/2010 at 16:33
      Author

    Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution

    The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

    Just when is this President going to start restoring and protecting the Constitution? He took an oath to do so. I’m waiting.

      • on 07/30/2010 at 03:19
    • on 07/30/2010 at 06:18

    so much for promises.

      • on 07/30/2010 at 06:39
        Author

      This is huge and the most some of his loyal supporters can muster is a yawn. I haven’t seen any “change” yet.

      OT, keep you head down over there.

    • on 07/30/2010 at 10:06

    RE: OT

      • on 07/30/2010 at 14:58
        Author

      You can send an e-mail or private tweet.  

        • on 07/30/2010 at 16:55

        the one under your name starzhollow?  

          • on 07/30/2010 at 17:34
            Author
            • on 07/30/2010 at 17:38

Comments have been disabled.