Table of Contents:
I. Quick History of the Creative Schools Approach Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) pushed by Jonathan Knapp in Dec. 2011 to Jan. 2012.
II. A Perspective on the implications of this MOU.
III. A Printable Petition
+++++
I. Quick History of the Creative Schools Approach Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) pushed by Jonathan Knapp in Dec. 2011 to Jan. 2012.
Tues. 6 Dec. an SEA email had a draft of MOU in it, but, no warning in the subject line about this issue.
Thurs. 8 Dec. SEA sent out an email with MOU stuff in it, subject “Exhibit A”.
Mon. 12 Dec. The SEA RA votes to not vote until the Jan. RA.
3 Jan an email from SEA with the FIRST mention of “Creative Approach Schools” – and a week later on 10 Jan they sent out an update.
In Jan. the SEA RA approved the MOU.
15 Feb. 2012 the school board approves the MOU.
http://saveseattleschools.blog…
http://saveseattleschools.blog…
5 March 2012 City Council member Tim Burgess weighs in the CAS MOU on Publicola.
http://publicola.com/2012/03/0…
In July the MOU is declared illegal.
http://saveseattleschools.blog…
+++++
II. A Perspective on the implications of this MOU.
This MOU is extremely dangerous for teachers, and even though there was an SEA vote affirming it last January, that document was found illegal in court in July.
After careful study of both the MOU and its supporting documents, we find that, far from its advertised intent of allowing creative teaching, it instead is much more about abrogating important protections we have within the collective bargaining agreement.
One of the most egregious provisions requires all teachers who wish to retain their jobs at a “Creative Approach” schools to sign a kind of binding 3-year duration “loyalty oath”.
Failure to sign, even for a teacher with otherwise excellent evaluations, would result in displacement. Displacement in a district with many “Creative Approach” would would have to end in termination for many, as openings for displaced personnel shrinks.
There is at present a chance to stop this MOU in its present form if enough signatures of SEA represented folks are gathered, quickly.
SEA leadership intends that the new version of this MOU not come up for any new consideration of SEA membership, at any level.
Recent Comments