Today? Pastries!

Remember them? How the NSA was Hoovering up everything right off the hubs and stashing it in a Black Glass building in Utah stuffed with so many servers it takes it’s own lake to cool?

Yeah, well, they’re still doing that.

But they’ve found in practice (as predicted) that it’s just too big a chunk of data to have any practical value so they’re putting it in the ‘too hard’ pile for now. This was of course trumpeted as a great liberalization and a big reform.

But it is just on-its-face UnConstitutional as I and other Civil Libertarians have been saying for over a decade now and finally, finally (or maybe we’re just finding out finally) even the FISA Court has been forced to agree.

Secret Court: FBI Warrantless Searches Were Illegal
by Spencer Ackerman, Daily Beast
10.08.19

Some of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s warrantless searches through the National Security Agency’s enormous troves of communications data violated the law and the Constitution, according to secret surveillance court rulings partially declassified on Tuesday.

The bureau’s so-called backdoor searches, long regarded by civil libertarians as a government end-run around warrant requirements, were overly broad, the court found. They appear to have affected what a judge on the court called “a large number of individuals, including U.S. persons.” On one day in December 2017 alone, the court found, the FBI conducted 6,800 queries of the NSA databases using Social Security numbers. The government, in secret, conceded that there were “fundamental misunderstandings” among some FBI personnel over the standards necessary for the searches.

The redacted ruling was kept secret for a year. It represented the latest legal battle over the scope of post-9/11 mass surveillance that affects American freedoms in the name of counterterrorism. It was one of several secret court documents released Tuesday by the ODNI.

Judge James Boasberg of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Court found last October that elements of FBI procedures for querying the databases and then purging irrelevant results–a mechanism to protect Americans’ privacy–“inconsistent with statutory minimization requirements and the requirements of the Fourth Amendment,” which protects Americans against unreasonable searches.

As early as March 2018, the FISA Court identified to the government that the FBI was not sufficiently documenting which of its queries were tied to people inside the United States, despite a statutory obligation to do so. Nor were the searches “reasonably designed” to find evidence of crimes or foreign spying.

“Without such documentation and in view of reported instances of non-compliance with that standard, the procedures seemed unreasonable under FISA’s definition of minimization procedures’ and possibly the Fourth Amendment,” Boasberg wrote.

Boasberg’s ruling represented a rare defeat for the government before the FISA Court, and the government appealed it to the FISA Court of Review, another rarity. The appeals court sided with the lower court in July, and the FBI agreed to change its querying, documentation, and related procedures.

The subsequent changes now require the FBI to explain why searching Americans’ data is necessary to find foreign-spying information or potential evidence of criminal activity, as well as to distinguish between its searches involving Americans and its searches involving foreigners.
…
NSA in March 2017 stopped collecting Americans’ electronic communications that merely discuss foreign surveillance targets, known as “about” collection, after violating restrictions placed on the collection by the FISA Court. Yet the FISA Court ruling indicates that the government attempted arguing that “about” collection was acceptable under PRISM, if not upstream collection. Boasberg rejected the argument.

In addition, the NSA, FBI, and CIA can warrantlessly search the vast Section 702 databases for information on Americans, something known as a backdoor search, something they have reported doing at least tens of thousands of times annually. Yet until a recent change, the FBI did not even record how many times it searched through the NSA databases for Americans’ information.

See? That shouldn’t creep you out at all.

Among the most risible things about Watergate (you put your tape along the door jamb, not across it so the Guard can see it) is the picture of Rose Mary Woods attempting to duplicate the circumstances under which she said she accidentally erased 18 minutes of the “Smoking Gun” Tape (immediately after the “Smoking Gun” statement so if done deliberately it contained admissions of guilt that would make the “Smoking Gun” pale in comparison).

Well in Ukraine-gate (I should devote some time to finding a catchy coinage for this debacle) there is this 5 hour gap between the last text from Ukrainian Ambassador Bill Taylor to EU Ambassador Gordon Sondland-

As I said on the phone, I think it’s crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign

And Sondland’s reply-

Bill, I believe you are incorrect about President Trump’s intentions. The President has been crystal clear no quid pro quo’s of any kind.

Followed by a warning that it’s really kind of dumb to conspire, in writing, to extort dirt on a Campaign Opponent from a Foreign National WHICH IS HIGHLY ILLEGAL! No fooling.

Now we find out that during the 5 hour gap secure phone lines were burning between Pennsylvania Avenue and Kiev. Coincidence?

It would be irresponsible not to speculate.