Jun 10 2011

Mo’ Meta, Mo’ Betta

Between the Belmont, Le Mans, and Circuit Gilles Villeneuve it’s shaping up a busy weekend.  You may well ask, “ek, why do you talk about sports so much?”

It’s a metaphor.

Consider today’s offering from The Gulf Daily News–

OVERTAKEN BY LIES..?

By ANWAR ABDULRAHMAN, The Gulf Daily News

Posted on Friday, June 10, 2011

Bahrain always assumed that the Western world was too wise and mature to mix politics with sport. But the way it is behaving towards our Grand Prix fixture begs many questions now about its judgement.

…

No country in the world can guarantee itself totally free of some form of domestic disturbances – and we fully understand that when lives and security are endangered, such events can be postponed, as happened here.

But to now use human rights allegations as an excuse to deprive Bahrain of such an important sporting occasion, contradicts every ethic and value, as well as the spirit of global competition in its broadest sense.

Because you know, after all, Jesse Owens humbled Hitler in Berlin (not actually the story you think it is, the real one is Marty Glickman).

But our hole is not yet to China, let’s dig a little deeper.

Unfortunately, hidden hands are at work to discredit Bahrain government’s positive measures which have restored law and order to the country. It seems as if there is a willingness for members of this sporting body to be swayed by opposition claims of ongoing and brutal repression.

…

The facts of the matter are simple. The government of Bahrain has advised that the country is a safe and secure destination to host the Bahrain Grand Prix in October this year. The FIA, F1 management and the teams should not allow political machinations of a disaffected and small opposition group to affect the decisions taken by the FIA which quite rightly are based entirely on logistics and security considerations.

For members of the F1 fraternity to single out Bahrain over questions of human rights issues is unacceptable victimisation. A number of other countries which host F1 are considered to be far more repressive. The same stance should apply to Bahrain as to these other nations.

Certainly Bahrain should share part of the blame for innocently allowing both international media and human rights organisations to twist the truth. For years they have been fed a dubious diet of information. However, we have relied on individuals like Lord Gilford and public relations organisations such as Bell-Pottinger (whose staff deserted the kingdom en masse as soon as trouble started). They have milked the country’s financial resources for a long time, yet failed to deliver any positive result.

From now on we hope such tasks will be undertaken by organisations with true local links, knowledge and understanding, as well as a genuine love for Bahrain.

The defamation of Bahrain was started by so-called native opposition elements, therefore only local, loyal media and public relations companies with a vested interest in the future of this country can be relied upon.

There are many highly capable, mature, experienced Bahrainis and expatriates who have been in this field all of their professional working lives.

They are the ones fully aware of internal politics, and only experts of such calibre can explain and influence Western thought and decision-making.

In fairness and to his credit Mr. Abdulrahman calls out Max Mosley as the fascist he is but to decry as he does “mixing sport with politics”…

My father is no different than any powerful man, any man with power, like a president or senator.

Do you know how naive you sound, Michael? Presidents and senators don’t have men killed.

Oh. Who’s being naive, Kay?

This could never happen here.  We’re “exceptional”.

rustymancuso581

2 comments

  2. Prize Horses Slower, and Maybe That’s Good

    Animal Kingdom, a horse who had never even competed on dirt, won the Kentucky Derby on the first Saturday in May and stamped himself the leader of his 3-year-old class. His time for the mile-and-a-quarter race, though, was an ordinary 2 minutes 2.04 seconds. Two weeks later, Shackleford, who finished fourth in the Derby, held off Animal Kingdom to win the shorter Preakness Stakes in 1:56.47, the slowest winning time in that race since 1993.

    Over the past several weeks, as the horses have prepared to face each other in Saturday’s Belmont Stakes, their owners and trainers have had to fend off criticism that Animal Kingdom and Shackleford are little more than the best of a bad bunch of 3-year-old thoroughbreds.

    But there are others who see significance in, and are even heartened by, the so-called mediocrity of the horses: their ordinary times are evidence that horses are not running on steroids anymore.

    “We had horses that were artificially fortified with steroids and that were trained harder and recovered faster and were able to run through their talent and stamina gene,” said John Ward, a third-generation trainer who won the 2001 Kentucky Derby with Monarchos. “Now we do not and maybe that’s why they are slower. But we’re also beginning to see a sounder horse that will last longer.”

Comments have been disabled.