Daily Archive: 10/08/2010

Oct 08 2010

Biting the Hand That Feeds You

They all got theirs from government grants, programs or jobs and many of their family members receive benefits like Medicare and Social Security. Now, if elected these Republicans want to eliminate, cut and decimate all the very programs that gave them a start.

Michele Bachmann did vote to protect farm subsidies for wealthy recipients

Despite Joe Miller Calling Federal Aid Unconstitutional, His Wife Received Unemployment Benefits

Ron Johnson’s Latest Hypocrisy on Government Assistance: His Own Job Was Created by a Government Grant

Sharron Angle And Her Husband Receive Government Health Care.

Hypocrites that want to turn the US into a third world country with the rich and the poor and let the banks, financial industry and corporations run the show with little or no oversight.

Oct 08 2010

Roubini Bad

I’ve tried to document in my posts on economics what a dismal position the United States is in.  I’ve tried to explain what Keynesian/Samuleson analysis predicts.  I’m Neo-Classical.

But now I’m going the full Roubini.

Title Fraud, let’s call it what it is, casts a question on the entire United States housing market- the single largest economic asset in the world financial system and leveraged up the wahzoo.  We are talking about vanishing tens of trillions of paper profits from the portfolios of the ‘stakeholders’.

This is going to cause massive economic disruption.  Easily the equal of 2008.

Welcome to shotgun and private fire department America.

Not that I’m in favor of either of those policies,  I think that even if people had minimum wage government jobs digging holes and filling them that would be about as good as anything except Food Stamps which also benefit billionaire ‘family farmers’.

There’s a ‘Jobs not Food Stamps’ program for you.

This is big.  Really, really big.

And whither CRE?  Et tu Brutus?

Ezra Klein: What’s happening here? Why are we suddenly faced with a crisis that wasn’t apparent two weeks ago?

Janet Tavakoli: This is the biggest fraud in the history of the capital markets. And it’s not something that happened last week. It happened when these loans were originated, in some cases years ago. Loans have representations and warranties that have to be met. In the past, you had a certain period of time, 60 to 90 days, where you sort through these loans and, if they’re bad, you kick them back. If the documentation wasn’t correct, you’d kick it back. If you found the incomes of the buyers had been overstated, or the houses had been appraised at twice their worth, you’d kick it back. But that didn’t happen here. And it turned out there were loan files that were missing required documentation. Part of putting the deal together is that the securitization professional, and in this case that’s banks like Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan, has to watch for this stuff. It’s called perfecting the security, and it’s not optional.

EK: And how much danger are the banks themselves in?

JT: When we had the financial crisis, the first thing the banks did was run to Congress and ask for accounting relief. They asked to be able to avoid pricing this stuff at the price where people would buy them. So no one can tell you the size of the hole in these balance sheets. We’ve thrown a lot of money at it. TARP was just the tip of the iceberg. We’ve given them guarantees on debts, low-cost funding from the Fed. But a lot of these mortgages just cannot be saved. Had we acknowledged this problem in 2005, we could’ve cleaned it up for a few hundred billion dollars. But we didn’t. Banks were lying and committing fraud, and our regulators were covering them and so a bad problem has become a hellacious one.

Oct 08 2010

Obama Listens!

On Monday October 04…

…the Supreme Court said it would not take up a warrantless surveillance case, Wilner v. National Security Agency (NSA), filed by the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR). The lawsuit argued that the Executive Branch must disclose whether or not it has records related to the wiretapping of privileged attorney-client conversations without a warrant. Lawyers for the Guantánamo detainees fit the officially acknowledged profile of those subject to surveillance under the former administration’s program, and the Bush administration argued in the past that the Executive Branch has a right to target them.

The Obama administration has never taken a position-in this or any of the other related cases-on whether the Bush administration’s NSA surveillance program was legal. In this case they claimed that even if it was illegal, the government has the right to remain silent when asked whether or not the NSA spied on lawyers,” said Shayana Kadidal, Senior Managing Attorney of the CCR Guantánamo Global Justice Initiative. “Today the Supreme Court let them get away with it.”  […]

The plaintiffs [had] filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request seeking records of any surveillance of their communications under the NSA’s warrantless surveillance program, which began after 9/11 but was only disclosed to the public in December 2005. The government refused to either confirm or deny whether such records existed, and the lower courts refused to order the government to confirm whether it had eavesdropped on attorney-client communications. The question before the Supreme Court was whether the government can refuse to confirm or deny whether records of such surveillance exist, even though any such surveillance would necessarily be unconstitutional and illegal.

more at CCR…

Real News Network’s Paul Jay talks with Shayana Kadidal** – Senior Managing Attorney of the Guantánamo Global Justice Initiative (GGJI) at the Center for Constitutional Rights about the CRR’s initiative and about this case and the Administration’s eavesdropping.



Real News Network – October 08, 2010

Shayana Kadidal: Government refuses to disclose possible wiretapping of civil rights lawyers

Oct 08 2010

Punting the Pundits

Punting the Punditsis an Open Thread. It is a selection of editorials and opinions from around the news medium and the internet blogs. The intent is to provide a forum for your reactions and opinions, not just to the opinions presented, but to what ever you find important.

Robert Reich: The Secret Big-Money Takeover of America

Not only is income and wealth in America more concentrated in fewer hands than it’s been in 80 years, but those hands are buying our democracy as never before — and they’re doing it behind closed doors.

Hundreds of millions of secret dollars are pouring into congressional and state races in this election cycle. The Koch brothers (whose personal fortunes grew by $5 billion last year) appear to be behind some of it, Karl Rove has rounded up other multimillionaires to fund right-wing candidates, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is funneling corporate dollars from around the world into congressional races, and Rupert Murdoch is evidently spending heavily.

No one knows for sure where this flood of money is coming from because it’s all secret.

But you can safely assume its purpose is not to help America’s stranded middle class, working class, and poor. It’s to pad the nests of the rich, stop all reform, and deregulate big corporations and Wall Street — already more powerful than since the late 19th century when the lackeys of robber barons literally deposited sacks of cash on the desks of friendly legislators.

Paul Krugman: The End of the Tunnel

The Erie Canal. Hoover Dam. The Interstate Highway System. Visionary public projects are part of the American tradition, and have been a major driver of our economic development.

And right now, by any rational calculation, would be an especially good time to improve the nation’s infrastructure. We have the need: our roads, our rail lines, our water and sewer systems are antiquated and increasingly inadequate. We have the resources: a million-and-a-half construction workers are sitting idle, and putting them to work would help the economy as a whole recover from its slump. And the price is right: with interest rates on federal debt at near-record lows, there has never been a better time to borrow for long-term investment.

But American politics these days is anything but rational. Republicans bitterly opposed even the modest infrastructure spending contained in the Obama stimulus plan. And, on Thursday, Chris Christie, the governor of New Jersey, canceled America’s most important current public works project, the long-planned and much-needed second rail tunnel under the Hudson River.

Mike Lux: Obama Comes Through on Foreclosure Issue: What’s Next?

When the notarization on foreclosures issue suddenly flared up over the last 24 hours, my heart sank. Just as regular homeowners were starting to get some legal traction to fight back against fraud and predatory lending by big banks, it seemed, some bank lobbyist had managed to sneak something through in the dead of night that would screw people over again. It was Washington at its worst: the bank lobbyists in control, and Congress asleep at the wheel.

But then, that most delightful and rare of Washington moments happened: the system worked. Consumer advocates started raising hell on the blogs and in traditional media, the White House started looking more closely at the issue, and literally within a matter of hours, Obama announced that he was not going to sign the bill. No long, painful, drawn out internal debate at 1600 Pennsylvania. No twisting round trying to split the middle on the issue. As soon as the issue was raised, the White House team focused on it, and made the right decision quickly. Elizabeth Warren, the new Assistant to the President and Treasury Secretary, weighed in. Pete Rouse, the new Chief of Staff, got engaged immediately. And the President made the right decision.

So what did we learn? First, that exposing sleazy dead-of-night deals cut by the special interests does sometimes work. And second, that having good people in key government roles really does matter. Obama might well have done the right thing without Warren and Rouse there, but it sure did happen quickly and easily with them around.

Oct 08 2010

On This Day in History: October 8

This is your morning Open Thread. Pour your favorite beverage and review the past and comment on the future.

October 8 is the 281st day of the year (282nd in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. There are 84 days remaining until the end of the year.

 

On this day in 1871, flames spark in the Chicago barn of Patrick and Catherine O’Leary, igniting a 2-day blaze that kills between 200 and 300 people, destroys 17,450 buildings,leaves 100,000 homeless and causes an estimated $200 million (in 1871 dollars; $3 billion in 2007 dollars) in damages.

The Great Chicago Fire was a conflagration  that burned from Sunday, October 8, to early Tuesday, October 10, 1871, killing hundreds and destroying about 4 square miles (10 km2) in Chicago, Illinois. Though the fire was one of the largest U.S.  disasters of the 19th century, the rebuilding that began almost immediately spurred Chicago’s development into one of the most populous and economically important American cities.

On the municipal flag of Chicago, the second star commemorates the fire. To this day the exact cause and origin of the fire remain a mystery.

The fire started at about 9 p.m. on Sunday, October 8, in or around a small shed that bordered the alley behind 137 DeKoven Street.[3]  The traditional account of the origin of the fire is that it was started by a cow kicking over a lantern in the barn owned by Patrick and Catherine O’Leary. Michael Ahern, the Chicago Republican reporter who created the cow story, admitted in 1893 that he had made it up because he thought it would make colorful copy.

The fire’s spread was aided by the city’s overuse of wood for building, a drought prior to the fire, and strong winds from the southwest that carried flying embers toward the heart of the city. The city also made fatal errors by not reacting soon enough and citizens were apparently unconcerned when it began. The firefighters were also exhausted from fighting a fire that happened the day before.

After the fire

Once the fire had ended, the smoldering remains were still too hot for a survey of the damage to be completed for days. Eventually it was determined that the fire destroyed an area about four miles (6 km) long and averaging 3/4 mile (1 km) wide, encompassing more than 2,000 acres (8 km²). Destroyed were more than 73 miles (120 km) of roads, 120 miles (190 km) of sidewalk, 2,000 lampposts, 17,500 buildings, and $222 million in property-about a third of the city’s valuation. Of the 300,000 inhabitants, 90,000 were left homeless. Between two and three million books were destroyed from private library collections. The fire was said by The Chicago Daily Tribune to have been so fierce that it surpassed the damage done by Napoleon’s siege of Moscow in 1812. Remarkably, some buildings did survive the fire, such as the then-new Chicago Water Tower, which remains today as an unofficial memorial to the fire’s destructive power. It was one of just five public buildings and one ordinary bungalow spared by the flames within the disaster zone. The O’Leary home and Holy Family Church, the Roman Catholic congregation of the O’Leary family, were both saved by shifts in the wind direction that kept them outside the burnt district.

Oct 08 2010

Morning Shinbun Friday October 8




Friday’s Headlines:

Chilean miners braced for release as drill breakthrough due in hours

HIV infections could hit 3.2m a year by 2031 if funding is not increased

USA

Flawed Foreclosure Documents Thwart Home Sales

History of telecom company illustrates lack of strategic trust between U.S., China

Europe

France’s highest legal authority removes last obstacle to ban on burka

Dutch queen approves coalition backed by anti-Islam party

Middle East

Gaza burns as Hamas declares war on drugs

Middle East squeeze on Obama

Asia

Afghanistan’s Reservoir Dogs: security firms criticised over ‘warlord payments’

 Hard turn for Khmer Rouge trial

Africa

Zimbabwe’s prime minister attacks Mugabe’s ‘betrayal’

World Cup cities want Fifa cash

Nobel Peace Prize awarded to China dissident Liu Xiaobo

Jailed Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo has been named the winner of the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize.

The BBC 8 October 2010  

The award, announced in Norway’s capital Oslo, is certain to anger Beijing, which had earlier warned against the move.

Norwegian Nobel Committee president Thorbjoern Jagland said Mr Liu was “the foremost symbol of the wide-ranging struggle for human rights in China”.

Mr Jagland earlier admitted he knew the choice would be controversial.

He told local television before the announcement: “You’ll understand when you hear the name.”

‘Curtailed freedom’

During the announcement of the award, Mr Jagland said China’s new status in the world “must have increased responsibility”.

He said that in practice the freedoms enshrined in China’s constitution had been “distinctly curtailed for many of China’s citizens”.

Oct 08 2010

Foreclosure Fraud

So let me tell you why foreclosure fraud is a big deal.

You see it’s not so much that banks are lying on court papers and breaking and entering houses illegally though those are a pretty big deal.

Nope.  It’s more that tens of trillions of dollars of paper valuations (an asset is only worth what you can sell it for) is now in question.

By dividing and bundling mortgages and failing to do the proper paperwork just to save a few bucks the banksters have put the entire land title chain of ownership under dispute.  This goes back to when bad King Charles the First (well, he was beheaded after all) granted a royal sanction to your stealing your land fron the Indians Natives (nor was he the first in any sense).

The point is that not only are the trillions of dollars of leveraged derivatives about to lose any value they ever had, but the underlying mortgages are going to be  uncollectible.

Insure against that AIG.

The result is not just going to be massive bank failures, but a complete lock up of all real estate transactions.

So serf, you are now bound to your land and can only sell to a boyar and a stupid one at that because he has no clear claim.

This is magnitudes worse than the market meltdown in 2008.

Oct 08 2010

Prime Time

A fair number of broadcast premiers.  Tonight’s playoff action on TBS, Yankees @ Twins, Braves @ Giants.

As a capitulation (since I haven’t yet) Rangers are poised to take down the Rays in 3 straight with a 2 nothing lead and dominating performances (5 – 1. 6 – 0). Phillies no hit the Reds (Don Larsen, who is still alive, sent congratulations).  Braves haven’t been tested against the Giants yet.  The Yankees Win!  Theeeeeeeeee Yankees Win!  Seriously, the Twins are outclassed here.

My predictions?  Rangers over Rays, Phillies over Reds, Braves over Giants, Yankees over Twins.  Yankees over Rangers, Phillies over Braves.  Phillies.

There, I’ve said it.

Later-

Dave has Stephen Colbert performing against himself, Johnny Knoxville, and Gorillaz.  Jon has Naomi Watts, Stephen Davis Guggenheim.  No Alton.  No Boondocks.