(10 am. – promoted by ek hornbeck)
Oops. Glen Greenwald points out a major flaw in Jon Stewart’s premise for his rally in Washington DC on 10/30/10 to counter the extremism on either side. While Jon has always been fair in his criticism of both Democrats and Republicans, left and right, his comparison of those the left saying that Bush is a war criminal as opposed to the right saying that Obama is a socialist, Muslim, non-American is a false equivalence since there is ample evidence to the former but not the latter.
The perils of false equivalencies and self-proclaimed centrism
I think Jon Stewart is one of the most incisive and effective commentators in the country, and he reaches an audience that would otherwise be politically disengaged. I don’t have any objection if he really wants to hold a rally in favor of rhetorical moderation, and it’s also fine if, as seems to be the case, he’s eager to target rhetorical excesses on both the left and right in order to demonstrate his non-ideological centrism. But the example he chose to prove that the left is guilty, too — the proposition that Bush is a “war criminal” — is an extremely poor one given that the General in charge of formally investigating detainee abuse (not exactly someone with a history of Leftist advocacy) has declared this to be the case, and core Nuremberg principles compel the same conclusion.
Leave aside the fact that, as Steve Benen correctly notes, Stewart’s examples of right-wing rhetorical excesses (Obama is a socialist who wasn’t born in the U.S. and hates America) are pervasive in the GOP, while his examples of left-wing excesses (Code Pink and 9/11 Truthers) have no currency (for better or worse) in the Democratic Party. The claim that Bush is “a war criminal” has ample basis, and it’s deeply irresponsible to try to declare this discussion off-limits, or lump it in with a whole slew of baseless right-wing accusatory rhetoric, in order to establish one’s centrist bona fides.
However, Mr. Greenwald gives Jon’s co-rally partner, Stephen Colbert, credit for being “extremely well-focused and on-point.”
| Rally to Restore Sanity | |||
| www.thedailyshow.com | |||
|
4 comments
Skip to comment form
Author
So he doesn’t miss the point again.
Come on, Jon, you’re better than this
Maybe I missed that day in class, but what did Code Pink ever do wrong?
Seems to me they disrupted some congressional hearings on TV to try to call to account our government doing some pretty awful stuff. The commited the crime of making people feel uncomfortable.
So that makes them extremists lowering the public discourse???
Seems to me they offended offended the MSM by airing the U.S. dirty laundry in public. Toughski shitski for them.
If the fourth estate did their job, and forced the congress & judicial to do theirs, maybe the U.S would have some dignity left.
Did Obama ask him to help alienate the base? He’s making this out to be some moderate cause…no extremists of either stripe need apply (read false equivalence).
Sad really. A lot of people like him. But this ticks me off.
Then I hear Ed Shultz dissed Hartmann and Rhodes for his little shindig. Granted Randi is no fan of his. And maybe he wants to control the message but…”One Nation?”